Java Moods

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg

Monday, 4 May 2009

Maven Enforcer Plugin: cool and annoying

Posted on 03:11 by Unknown

As a Maven expert, you probably have heard of maven-enforcer-plugin, "The Loving Iron Fist of Maven", as they say.

It's so cool!

The idea is pretty cool: the plugin provides goals to ensure that the environment used to run Maven is like you – the POM author – expected it to be. There are checks for constraints on the version of Maven or JDK, on the OS family, to enforce certain dependency requirements, and much more. This list on the web site gives you an impression on what kind of checks are provided.

Do you know what happens when you write your POMs and settings for Maven version 2.0.9 or greater, but somebody is still using an outdated 2.0.4? Well, this kind of issues is annoying and you better make sure it does not happen.

The current version of maven-enforcer-plugin (at the time we set it up) was 1.0-alpha-4 which sounded not very mature, but nevertheless we decided to use it. For our projects, we identified a couple of things we wanted to check, and we configured the plugin accordingly:

  • Java Version: should be 1.5.
  • Maven version: must at least be 2.1.0.
  • Enforce defined versions for all plugins, and disallow any use of "LATEST", "RELEASE" or "SNAPSHOT" as a version for any plugin.

Hey, SNAPSHOT plugins are just dangerous and you should never, never ever depend on them. The only exclusion could be plugins developed inhouse, but actually, no – not really. Bah, don't use SNAPSHOT plugins. Period.

So, we tried to setup our enforcer plugin configuration like this:

<plugin>
<artifactId>maven-enforcer-plugin</artifactId>
<version>1.0-alpha-4</version>
<executions>
<execution>
<id>enforce-versions</id>
<goals>
<goal>enforce</goal>
</goals>
<configuration>
<rules>
<requireMavenVersion>
<version>[2.1.0,)</version>
</requireMavenVersion>
<requireJavaVersion>
<version>1.5</version>
</requireJavaVersion>
<requirePluginVersions>
<message>Best Practice is to always define plugin versions!</message>
<banLatest>true</banLatest>
<banRelease>true</banRelease>
<banSnapshots>true</banSnapshots>
</requirePluginVersions>
</rules>
</configuration>
</execution>
</executions>
</plugin>
Of course, we wanted to apply the same checks on command line as within Eclipse when using m2eclipse plugin.

It's so annoying!

Well, and here is where the trouble started...

Shot one. Oh, wait, we are using Maven version 2.1.0-M1 currently. Guess what? This is not included in range [2.1.0,) which means every version x >= 2.1.0. Okay. Let's use [2.1.0-M1,) instead.

Shot two. What about Eclipse? The check fails within Eclipse, and it turns out that the version number reported by the Maven embedder used by m2eclipse (0.96 at that time) is 2.1-SNAPSHOT. Thus, enforcer fails and we'll have to use this for the Maven version specification:

<version>[2.1.0-M1,),[2.1-SNAPSHOT,)</version>

Ugly, but still manageable...

Shot three. My team reported the enforcer plugin to sometimes use some "thinking time" when checking the environment – it seems to hang for couple of seconds. We all see that betimes, and I have no idea what it is caused by. Actually, performing those version checks should be fast as light, right?

What makes this even worse is the fact that in multi-module builds, enforcer plugin is called for each subproject. It binds by default to the validate lifecycle phase which is executed for every subproject. However, the environment does not change very much during a single build, so it would be sufficient to check that only once per Maven call...

Shot four. When establishing the cool Sonar quality management platform, Maven started to complain that "some plugins are missing valid versions". Seems that Sonar defines dependencies to other artifacts used internally, but doesn't give a version for them. All you can do is specify a version for those plugins in the <pluginManagement> section of one of your parent POMs. That's actually not what you want: explicitely list versions for artifacts used internally by the current version of a build tool... But what else can you do? Completely disable the requirePluginVersions check?

Shot five. After upgrading m2eclipse to version 0.97, it does not correctly handle our enforcer configuration any more and instead yields an error:

org.apache.maven.lifecycle.LifecycleExecutionException: Invalid or missing parameters: [Mojo parameter [name: 'rules'; alias: 'null']] for mojo: org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-enforcer-plugin:1.0-alpha-4:enforce

This is a known issue, and you have to uncheck the "Skip Maven compiler plugin when processing resources" checkbox in the project's properties. That means, we have to change configuration for all our projects :-(

Moreover, it was the default to check this option and it seems to have negative performance impact when deselected.

Game over. This is the point where we eliminated enforcer plugin. Too much pain for a little helper tool. One of those things that seems to be quite cool at first glance, but starts to annoy you very soon.

Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Posted in Maven, QA | No comments
Newer Post Older Post Home

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Popular Posts

  • Eclipse: User Operation is Waiting, and Waiting, ...
    I am using Eclipse since quite a long time, sometimes around 2002. That was version 2.0, if I remember correctly. Since then, I have always ...
  • Maven Plugin Releases: Do it yourself!
    In my previous post , I have complained about Maven plugins that do not release new versions although there are blocking issues that are rep...
  • Maven 3 and Plugin Mysteries
    You probably know that Maven 3 has landed . Before testing it with our projects, I was curious about the plugins that are defined in the Mav...
  • Maven Plugins: Current Versions
    Upgrading Maven Plugins In preparation for a later switch to Maven 3 (which is already knocking on the door ) as well as to get rid of some ...
  • Maven Setting for Using a Single Repo Manager
    In a previous post I have tried to explain why it's a good idea to define your Maven repository in your settings.xml file instead of t...
  • Integration test with Maven, Cargo and JBoss
    It's Friday... ... and I thought it would be a good idea to setup an integration test of some EJBs we are creating in a new project. Act...
  • DocBook with Maven Issue
    We are using DocBook for writing technical documentation for all our projects and in-house frameworks. We are actually quite happy with thi...
  • Maven Profiles: Activation... or not
    I love Maven. Really, I do. I should say that since this is my first post in my own blog (I know, I'm probably the last man on the plane...
  • Having Fun with Encoding!
    Compiler Plugin Recently, I edited our main company root POM to upgrade some plugins to new versions. Of course, we are following best pract...
  • Maven Documentation: The Missing List
    A rather weak talent of Maven is probably its documentation. This is my personal opinion, but it seem to match what other people think . Y...

Categories

  • BestPractices
  • Cargo
  • Checkstyle
  • Eclipse
  • Google
  • Hudson
  • Java
  • JBoss
  • JEE
  • Jenkins
  • JUnit
  • Maven
  • Nexus
  • oAW
  • Optimization
  • OSGi
  • Performance
  • Profiles
  • QA
  • Size
  • Spring
  • Testing
  • Tools
  • WebApp
  • Windows

Blog Archive

  • ►  2011 (5)
    • ►  May (1)
    • ►  April (1)
    • ►  March (2)
    • ►  February (1)
  • ►  2010 (11)
    • ►  October (2)
    • ►  September (1)
    • ►  April (1)
    • ►  March (1)
    • ►  February (4)
    • ►  January (2)
  • ▼  2009 (30)
    • ►  December (3)
    • ►  November (4)
    • ►  October (2)
    • ►  September (3)
    • ►  June (4)
    • ▼  May (5)
      • Maven Plugin Releases: Do it yourself!
      • Maven Compromised by Plugins
      • Update to Checkstyle 5.0
      • Eclipse: Update Manager Fools Me
      • Maven Enforcer Plugin: cool and annoying
    • ►  April (4)
    • ►  March (5)
Powered by Blogger.

About Me

Unknown
View my complete profile